Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaime Faria vs Chun Hsin Tseng Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Faria vs Tseng analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaime Faria vs Chun Hsin Tseng Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Faria has won 49.38% of points on his second serve, while Tseng has won 50.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Faria, in recent form, has won 55.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tseng has won 51.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.15% and 30.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Faria has saved 61.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tseng has saved 62.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Faria has won 71.59% of matches played (W/L 63/ 25), with Tseng winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Faria has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 79/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 98/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Faria has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.44% of matches (W/L 43/ 14), where as Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Faria winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Faria winning 2 and Tseng winning 0. The last match between Faria and Tseng was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 17-04-2024, Second, Clay with Jaime Faria getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Faria and Tseng have played a deciding set 0 times, with Faria winning 0 times and Tseng 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Faria winning 0, and Tseng 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Faria has played against opponents with an average rank of 249.41 while Tseng has played against players with an average rank of 348.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Faria has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tseng has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Faria has converted 49.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tseng has converted 42.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Faria 1 - 0 Tseng
233
Rank
230
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
248
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
65% (135-73)
Career Total W/L
59% (210-144)
82% (32-7)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$6,215
Career Prize Money
$180,215
4
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jaime Faria | Chun Hsin Tseng |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:9 | 1:22:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (28/54) | 52% (28/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (20/28) | 75% (21/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 38% (10/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (23/54) | 31% (17/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaime Faria | Chun Hsin Tseng |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (32/7) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (68/24) | 51% (35/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (515/384) | 50% (326/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 95% (20/1) | 46% (6/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 73% (11/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 216 | 90 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 157 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:55 | 1:51:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 272.23 | 340.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1649/2914) | 54% (1126/2101) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1198/1649) | 70% (786/1126) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (635/1265) | 51% (495/975) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (151/318) | 43% (83/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1216/2858) | 39% (800/2054) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (10/5) | 61% (17/11) |
| Futures W/L | 95% (20/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (32/38) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (11/15) | 82% (9/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (29/27) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (29/2) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 29% (17/5) |
Jaime Faria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Gustavo Heide
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Jaime Faria
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Jan Kumstat
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jaime Faria
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
66 of
119)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Jaime Faria
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vilius Gaubas
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Faria Vs Tseng Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jaime Faria
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
